Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
December 19, 2025CureusOpen Access

Open Versus Closed Reduction in Subtrochanteric Femur Fractures: The Critical Role of Acceptable Reduction in Healing Outcomes

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

PSPedro SeabraDGDaniel GonçalvesPSPedro Simões

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Retrospective cohort study shows better alignment in open reduction, suggesting reduction quality is crucial for reducing nonunion rates.

Key Points

  • This study aims to compare open and closed reduction techniques in treating subtrochanteric femur fractures.
  • Retrospective cohort study including 114 patients with subtrochanteric fractures treated surgically.
  • Open reduction defined as requiring an incision ≥3cm, assessed via modified Baumgaertner criteria.
  • Outcomes analyzed included delayed union and nonunion using statistical methods like Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.
  • Acceptable reduction achieved more often in the open group (94.9% vs. 68.0%; p=0.001).
  • Mean time to union was shorter in open reduction (18.2 weeks) but not significant (p=0.055).
  • Reduction quality was a strong predictor of outcomes; acceptable reductions led to faster union (p<0.001) and lower rates of nonunion.

Cite This Study

Seabra et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69449a892f0218eca9508310https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.99488
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share