Qualitative analysis reveals substantive impacts on systems integration in youth mental health, suggesting evaluations should include multi-level outcomes.
Key Points
Long-term impacts on systems integration were identified following the Agenda Gap program, indicating significant changes.
Reflexive thematic analysis demonstrated qualitative outcomes experienced by youth and community members post-intervention.
Observational analysis across different socioecological levels highlighted the importance of qualitative, participatory evaluation methods.
Findings support the need for comprehensive evaluations that capture both intended and unintended impacts of youth mental health initiatives.