Cross-sectional survey reveals information quality affects behavioral intention in hotel booking, suggesting strategic implications for travel platforms.
Purpose This study uncovers the determinants affecting hotel booking intentions in the Trivago’s information ecosystem. For this purpose, the information adoption model and the theory of planned behavior were integrated with additional constructs viz., trust (TR) and satisfaction (ST). Design/methodology/approach A cross-sectional online survey was administered through Trivago’s official Facebook page. The data were analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) 20 and Analysis of Moment Structures (AMOS) 22.0, with hypotheses tested through structural equation modeling. Findings This study presents a thorough model that explains the drivers of hotel booking intentions in the Trivago’s information ecosystem. The results confirm most of the proposed hypotheses, with information quality significantly influencing attitude, while attitude, subjective norms, perceived behavioral control and satisfaction show significant positive effects on behavioral intention (BI). However, the paths from source credibility to attitude and trust to behavioral intention are not significant, leading to the rejection of H2 and H6. Research limitations/implications This study offers several theoretical and practical implications for scholars and practitioners. It advances understanding of how Trivago’s information ecosystems shape booking intentions beyond technology-focused models and guides travel platforms in designing effective strategies to influence customer decisions and improve bookings. Originality/value This study uniquely examines the influence of Trivago’s information ecosystem on consumers’ hotel booking intentions, a less explored area. While prior studies emphasize habits, cuisine and mobility, this work offers new insights into the travel sector by underscoring the role of information-driven factors in booking behavior.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khan et al. (2025) studied this question.