This analysis reveals enhanced agility and measures of explosive strength in male badminton players using different training surfaces, indicating the benefits of plyometric training.
Background Badminton is a high-intensity sport that demands explosive strength, dynamic balance, and agility. Plyometric training (PT) is crucial for enhancing these abilities, yet there is limited research comparing sand-based PT to hard-surface PT in badminton players. Objective This study compared the effects of sand-based PT and hard-surface PT on lower-extremity explosive strength, dynamic balance, and agility in male badminton players. Methods Twenty-eight male collegiate badminton players were randomly assigned to a sand-based PT group (n = 14) or a hard-surface PT group (n = 14). Both groups performed plyometric programs twice weekly for 8 weeks. Outcomes measurement before and after training included countermovement jump (CMJ) height, squat jump (SJ) height, drop jump (DJ) height, standing long jump (SLJ) distance, Y-balance test (YBT), hexagon jump test, and badminton-specific agility test (lateral agility test and four-corner agility test). We used two-way repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) (time × group) with Bonferroni post hoc tests, and effect sizes were reported as partial eta squared ( η p 2 ) or Cohen’s d (p < 0.05). Results Statistical analysis revealed significant time main effects across multiple metrics: CMJ height (F = 81.26, p < 0.01, η p 2 = 0.75), SJ height (F = 82.86, p < 0.01, η p 2 = 0.76), DJ height (F = 54.58, p < 0.01, η p 2 = 0.68, large effect), SLJ distance (F = 49.86, p < 0.01, η p 2 = 0.66), dynamic balance ability (p < 0.01), and agility (p < 0.01), no significant between-group differences were found for any of the variables (p > 0.05). Additionally, a significant interaction effect between time and group was observed in the left leg to right (F = 4.76, p = 0.04). Conclusion This study indicates that both sand-based PT and hard-surface PT over 8 weeks significantly enhance explosive power, dynamic balance, and agility performance, with no significant differences between groups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Deng et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: