This analysis demonstrates effective economic cooperation in the electric vehicle sector through IA-CEPA, highlighting skills development and mutual benefits.
This research examines how Indonesia and Australia address their respective interests in the electric vehicle (EV) sector through the Indonesia-Australia Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (IA-CEPA), conceptualized as an international regime. By applying Krasner’s framework of principles, norms, rules, and decision-making processes, this study assesses the effectiveness of IA-CEPA in facilitating economic cooperation and mutual benefits. The research first provides an overview of IA-CEPA’s structure andits classification as an international regime. It then explores two key case studies: the IA-CEPA Economic Cooperation Program (ECP) Katalis and the Indonesia-Australia Skills Exchange (IASE). The Katalis program has played a crucial role in funding initiatives that promote investment and collaboration in the EV industry, while IASE serves as a platform for upskilling Indonesianworkers in sectors relevant to electric mobility. These cases illustrate how IA-CEPA functions as a mechanism to align bilateral interests, not only in the EV sector but also in areas such as trade, e-commerce, skills development, and investment. Furthermore, the study highlights the potential for Indonesia and Australia to expand their cooperation under IA-CEPA by conducting market research on green hydrogen, a key component of future sustainable transportation. Through qualitative analysis and secondary data sources, this research argues that IA-CEPA exemplifies a successful international regime, fostering economic integration and sustainable industrial transformation. The findings contribute to discussions on economic diplomacy, international cooperation, and the role of bilateral agreements in addressing global sustainability challenges.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grammy Romeo Wibisono (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: