Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
October 10, 2025Biological and Clinical Sciences Research Journal

Comparison of Feto-Maternal Outcomes of Conventional Method vs Reverse Breach Extraction Method in Delivering Deeply Engaged Foetal Head at Caesarean Section

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

RFRabia FatimaARAmna RafiqueAMAnum Mehr

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Randomised controlled trial compares maternal and neonatal outcomes of two surgical techniques during cesarean sections for obstructed labour, revealing key implications.

Key Points

  • The reverse breech extraction method significantly reduces blood loss during cesarean sections compared to the conventional method.
  • Lower rates of uterine incision extension were noted in the reverse breech group, enhancing maternal safety during surgery.
  • NICU admissions were also significantly less frequent among neonates delivered using the reverse breech extraction method.
  • This innovative technique highlights an effective alternative for managing deeply impacted fetal heads during obstructed labour.

Cite This Study

Fatima et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e8619c7ef2f04ca37e429chttps://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v6i6.1183
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1COMPARISON OF FETOMATERNAL OUTCOMES OF PUSH VS PULL TECHNIQUE IN SECOND STAGE CESAREAN SECTION2025
  2. 2A prospective study of maternal complications as predictors of C-sections and their impact on neonatal outcomes2025
  3. 3EXPERIENCE OF THE USE OF VACUUM EXTRACTOR IN DELIVERY ASSISTANCE2025
  4. 4Fetal Outcome in Primigravida Females Presenting with Breech Pregnancy at Term2025
  5. 5Comparison of Perinatal Outcome for All Modes of Second Stage Delivery in Obstetrics Theatres2025