This review examines court findings on joint liability and the implications of breach of debt agreements.
Breach of contract implementation is a phenomenon that often occurs in practice. Many factors cause breach of contract, either due to the fault of the parties or beyond the fault of the parties. A joint liability lawsuit is one form of lawsuit that can be used in civil disputes, namely if one party is in default as in a housing development agreement. As a result of the law of default on the joint liability agreement for debts, the injured party files a lawsuit so that the party causing the loss can complete the payment. Other losses due to default that do not fulfill the debt agreement result in the loss of expected profits if there is no default, so that the parties who cause losses together (jointly liable) must pay and provide compensation for delays and deliberate failure to pay their debts. The conclusion of the discussion is that the legal considerations of the judge in the decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1017 K / Pdt / 2021 are that the defendants were proven to have purchased goods in the form of granite for which payment was made in installments or installments but until the agreed time the Defendants did not fulfill their obligations to the plaintiffs even though they had been warned by the plaintiffs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nasution et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: