The research investigates the potential benefits of artificial intelligence tools in primary education, suggesting their advantages for senior students.
Thearticle comprehensively examines the possibilities of using tools (elements) of artificial intelligence in the process of primary education. The study identifies the need to develop skills in working with elements of artificial intelligence among senior students of the educational program “Pedagogy and Methods of Primary Education” at a higher educational institution. The introduction presents the relevance of the topic, the purpose, and the objectives of the research. In addition, the article discusses the advantages of using artificial intelligence tools. The presented study also provides a definition of the concept of “artificial intelligence”. A review of the works of foreign and domestic scholars who have studied this issue is conducted, including their opinions on bots, ChatGPT, and other similar technologies. However, the literature review notes that the potential for using artificial intelligence tools in primary education has not been fully explored. The next section provides information about the research methods, namely observation and survey. The final section presents detailed results of these methods. The research findings include diagrams illustrating data obtained through observation and surveys of 3rd- and 4th-year students of the “Pedagogy and Methods of Primary Education” program at Abai Kazakh National Pedagogical University. The study concludes that elements of artificial intelligence enhance interest in the learning process. Furthermore, the study identifies the need for developing specialized courses that demonstrate the possibilities of applying artificial intelligence tools in primary education. The survey results are processed and presented using the SPSS software.Based on the research findings, a recommendation is made to develop a specialized course aimed at training future primary education teachers to work with artificial intelligence tools.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yessentayeva et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: