The illusion of inclusion: structural and methodological gaps in biology education research

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

The analysis reveals a heavy reliance on psychological perspectives in biology education research, limiting insights.
About 78% of articles lump participants together, indicating a lack of disaggregation in research design.
A significant 58% of research utilized quantitative methods like surveys, while only 17% used qualitative methods such as interviews.
Merging social science contributions is vital to enhance understanding and broaden STEM participation in education.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

This literature review highlights methodological deficiencies in biology education research, suggesting integration of social science approaches.

Idlebird et al. (2025) studied this question.

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

This literature review highlights methodological deficiencies in biology education research, suggesting integration of social science approaches.