Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
October 2, 2025Journal of Progressive Law and Legal StudiesOpen Access

Harmonization of Positive Law and Islamic Law in Handling Election Violations in Jambi

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

ISIron SahroniRIRahmi Hidayati Al IdrusiahMMMaryani Maryani

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Qualitative analysis of election crimes in Jambi showing the interplay between positive law and Islamic law.

Key Points

  • The study identifies prevalent election violations including money politics and vote rigging, emphasizing their significance.
  • Among reported violations in Jambi, the majority were administrative, although several were escalated to criminal cases.
  • This analysis utilizes qualitative methods, combining literature studies and field data from various agencies in Jambi.
  • The findings suggest a necessary synergy between positive law and Islamic criminal law to promote fair elections.

Cite This Study

Sahroni et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68de68f683cbc991d0a21dd9https://doi.org/10.59653/jplls.v3i03.1926
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Legal Analysis of Criminal Sanctions for Electoral Offenses in Indonesia2025
  2. 2Indonesia’s 2024 Election: Constitutional Court Perspectives on Electoral Violations2025
  3. 3Participation of Jambi Malay Traditional Institutions in Strengthening Election Integrity Through Efforts to Prevent Money Politics2025
  4. 4Implementation of The Application of Election Crime Sanctions in South Sulawesi Province2025
  5. 5Election Crimes and the Architect of Restorative Justice to Achieve Electoral Justice2025