This article demonstrates the need for creativity in education to address global uncertainty, highlighting the limitations of techno-rationalism.
As artificial intelligence continues to reshape society and global crises intensify, traditional education systems are proving increasingly inadequate. Their hierarchical and rigid structures are ill-suited to address the needs of an interconnected and unpredictable world. In response, this article calls for a decisive shift away from dominant techno-rationalist frameworks. Drawing on the work of Eisner (2005), Rizvi and Lingard (2010), and Giroux and Bosio (2020), the author advocates for educational approaches rooted in curiosity, imaginative engagement, and critical relationality. Central to this vision is the Zenith Principle, inspired by Ames Van Meter’s (1952) conception of the zenith as the highest expression of human potential – a potential now under threat from the encroachment of techno-rationalism. The Zenith Principle offers a conceptual lens through which to reclaim education as a creative and emancipatory endeavour, foregrounding the tension between optimal human interpretation and the expanding influence of technology. This paper will be of interest to educators and researchers grappling with how to balance technological advancement with human embodied creativity in educational contexts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
N. Palmer (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: