September 25, 2025Open Access

Is Percutaneous Internal Ring Suturing (PIRS) a Safe Option for Adolescent Inguinal Hernia Repair? A Comparative Analysis

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Laparoscopic PIRS repair had a recurrence rate comparable to open high ligation, with only one recurrence noted.
Diagnostic concordance was statistically significant, showing perfect concordance in the open group and near-perfect in the PIRS group.
The mean follow-up duration was significantly longer in the open group, challenging the short-term assessment of PIRS outcomes.
This study supports PIRS as a safe option for adolescent inguinal hernia repair when considering complication and recurrence rates.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Implication

Comparative analysis shows laparoscopic percutaneous internal ring suturing is effective, indicating similar recurrence rates and diagnostic concordance with open high ligation.

Cite This Study

Bahadır et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d5e1ffbd7882ccb9b8667b https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7593845/v1

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Implication

Comparative analysis shows laparoscopic percutaneous internal ring suturing is effective, indicating similar recurrence rates and diagnostic concordance with open high ligation.

Is Percutaneous Internal Ring Suturing (PIRS) a Safe Option for Adolescent Inguinal Hernia Repair? A Comparative Analysis

Key Points

Discussion

Implication

Cite This Study

Is Percutaneous Internal Ring Suturing (PIRS) a Safe Option for Adolescent Inguinal Hernia Repair? A Comparative Analysis

Key Points

Discussion

Implication

Cite This Study