September 26, 2025Bangladesh Journal of Obstetrics & GynaecologyOpen Access

Comparative Analysis of Outcome between Laparoscopic versus transabdominal Open Surgical Repair for Vesicovaginal Fistula

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Laparoscopic repair resulted in a shorter mean operative time, significantly lower than open repair with p<0.01.
Patients in the laparoscopic group had shorter mean hospital stays, averaging significantly less than in the open repair group (p<0.001).
Postoperative complications were significantly more frequent in the open repair group, with a noteworthy p-value of <0.034.
Recurrence rates of fistula were similar between both repair methods, indicating that laparoscopic repair is a feasible option.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Implication

Retrospective study compares laparoscopic and open surgical repair outcomes for vesicovaginal fistulas, indicating lower complications with laparoscopic methods.

Cite This Study

Mondal et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d5e189136d0912e8f6e909 https://doi.org/10.3329/bjog.v39i1.82116

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Implication

Retrospective study compares laparoscopic and open surgical repair outcomes for vesicovaginal fistulas, indicating lower complications with laparoscopic methods.

Comparative Analysis of Outcome between Laparoscopic versus transabdominal Open Surgical Repair for Vesicovaginal Fistula

Key Points

Discussion

Implication

Cite This Study

Comparative Analysis of Outcome between Laparoscopic versus transabdominal Open Surgical Repair for Vesicovaginal Fistula

Key Points

Discussion

Implication

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider