Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
September 25, 2025Analisis Sejarah.Open Access

Indonesia’s Policy Response to Malaysian Cultural Claims (2007–2019)

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

AHAbrar HalimWSWannofri SamryAAAnatona Anatona

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Qualitative analysis highlights cultural policy's role in identity and sovereignty, suggesting proactive measures enhance international relations.

Key Points

  • Cultural claims prompted Indonesia to adopt both reactive and proactive cultural policies.
  • The Indonesian government expedited UNESCO registrations for cultural heritage, including Batik and Angklung.
  • Legal frameworks were fortified with Law No. 11/2010 on Cultural Heritage and Law No. 5/2017 on Cultural Advancement.
  • The Indonesian Cultural House program emerged as a vital soft power tool for enhancing diplomacy and engaging the diaspora.

Cite This Study

Halim et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d5bd6edc445aa9033b09cahttps://doi.org/10.25077/jas.v15i2.143
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Cultural Advancement Strategy: Realities, Paradigms, and Policy Orientations in Managing UNESCO Cultural Heritage2025
  2. 2Cultural Tourism Business Management: A Fair and Sustainable Strategy Based on Local Participation and Digital Innovation for Indonesia's Cultural Image2025
  3. 3The Influence of Globalization on Political and Social Policies in Indonesia2025
  4. 4Conflict of Law in the Safeguarding of Malaysian Intangible Cultural Heritage: A Way Forward2025
  5. 5Uncovering the Way of K-Pop as a Cultural Diplomacy Strategy South Korea in Indonesia2023