Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
September 23, 2025International Journal of Current Pharmaceutical ResearchOpen Access

Comparison of Cement Augmentation vs Non-Augmented Fracture Fixation of Intertrochanteric Femur Fracture in Elderly Patients

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

ABAmandeep Singh BakshiJSJaspreet SinghAAAbhishek AbhishekUniversity of Nottingham

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

This prospective study compares functional outcomes and complications of cement augmentation versus non-augmented fixation in elderly patients with intertrochanteric femur fractures.

Key Points

  • Cement augmentation showed longer operative time but similar functional outcomes compared to non-augmented fixation.
  • At follow-ups, both groups displayed comparable functional outcomes using the Harris Hip Score and Barthel index.
  • Radiological analysis noted significant differences in screw sliding distance, indicating varying biomechanical stability between groups.
  • Complications were minimal and comparable across both treatment methods, with no systemic issues reported.

Cite This Study

Bakshi et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d440a6713b0b5dfea7fddchttps://doi.org/10.22159/ijcpr.2025v17i5.7070
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share