Numerical simulations reveal splitter blades improve wear characteristics in solid-liquid two-phase flow, suggesting better pump longevity.
Splitter-blade impellers are increasingly being adopted in centrifugal pumps due to their superior performance. However, their service life is significantly reduced when handling fluids containing even small amounts of sediment. To investigate the wear characteristics of splitter-blade centrifugal pumps under solid-liquid two-phase flow conditions, a combined approach of numerical simulation and experimental study was employed to analyze wall wear under low solid-phase particle concentrations. The results demonstrate that the numerical simulations meet the required accuracy for analysis, with maximum relative errors of 4.8% for head and 3.4% for efficiency. The head curve of the centrifugal pump equipped with splitter blades is generally higher than that of the pump without splitter blades under both single-phase and solid-liquid two-phase flow conditions. Notably, under low-flow-rate conditions in the solid-liquid two-phase flow, the impeller with splitter blades demonstrates better head stability. Although the introduction of splitter blades alters the flow field structure at the impeller inlet to some extent, it also enhances the uniformity of pressure and velocity distribution in the circumferential direction at the impeller outlet. The presence of splitter blades primarily affects the wear characteristics on the pressure side of the blades and the middle and rear regions of the impeller rear shroud, resulting in reduced wear. However, as the solid particle concentration increases, impeller wear becomes more severe, suggesting that this type of centrifugal pump should be avoided in high-concentration conditions. Therefore, impellers with splitter blades exhibit certain advantages in transporting fluids with low solid-phase concentrations. This study provides important theoretical insights and data support for the hydraulic optimization of centrifugal pump structures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhao et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: