Literature review assesses child labour risk in the extraction of critical minerals, highlighting supply chain injustices.
In order to meet the Paris Agreement and EU Green Deal, the demand for critical minerals (e.g., cobalt, nickel, lithium, and rare earth elements) is growing exponentially. With their demand arise urgent concerns about the injustices of their supply chain, including concerns about labour exploitation, environmental degradation, and child labour. This literature review examines news media, blogs, governmental and NGO reports, and academic sources to assess the risk of child labour in the extraction of 34 EU-designated critical minerals, 17 of which are considered ‘strategic.’ Using a combined risk reduction and assessment framework, the study identifies high-risk minerals (cobalt, graphite, nickel, aluminium, copper, and rare earth elements) and high-risk countries (the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Mozambique, India, the Philippines, Indonesia, and Myanmar). The findings reveal the broader negative impact on communities of mining, including increased vulnerability to child trafficking and sexual exploitation. Thus, the risk of child labour does not imply its actual occurrence due to the biased undercount of child labour numbers. Recommendations include further research, raising awareness of children’s rights, supporting household livelihoods, and improving traceability in artisanal and small-scale mining to ensure a just transition.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kutscher et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: