This investigation shows no significant difference in inhibitory control between bilingual and monolingual infants, suggesting limited effects of language exposure.
The research into bilingual inhibitory control advantage in pre-verbal infants is very limited and has inconsistent findings. One possible explanation for this inconclusion is the appropriateness of tasks used to measure inhibitory control in young participants. This study used the Early Childhood Inhibitory Touchscreen Task (ECITT; Holmboe et al., 2021) to measure response inhibition in infants aged 10 and 16 months (N=205). A significant effect of inhibitory control (better performance on accuracy and reaction time; p<.001 [-.47, -32]) was found, such that performance was better when there was no inhibitory demand. This did not differ depending on the age of the infant (10 or 16 months), language background (monolingual or bilingual), or the interaction of age and language. This suggests that exposure to two languages (measured crudely) does not influence inhibitory control in young infants or at least may not be detectable in behavioural tests under 16 months old.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Barr et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: