Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
September 17, 2025Frontiers in Cardiovascular MedicineOpen Access

Higher premature atrial contraction burden after radiofrequency ablation vs. pulsed field or cryoballoon ablation in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a 3-year follow-up retrospective study

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

YJYongxing JiangCLChenxu LuoMFMingjun Feng

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Retrospective analysis shows similar arrhythmia freedom in patients with PAF after PFA, CBA, or RFA, indicating PAC burden differs by technique.

Key Points

  • PAC burden was significantly lowest in patients treated with pulsed field ablation, achieving 0.04% compared to 0.05% with cryoballoon ablation and 0.11% with radiofrequency ablation.
  • The freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia >30 s after 3 years was 76.9% for pulsed field ablation, 72.7% for cryoballoon ablation, and 66.9% for radiofrequency ablation.
  • Procedural time was shortest with pulsed field ablation at 91 minutes, while fluoroscopy time was shortest with radiofrequency ablation at 9 minutes.
  • The study included 280 patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation who underwent catheter ablation through different techniques.

Cite This Study

Jiang et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d43285713b0b5dfea71ac3https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2025.1627579
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share