This analysis proposes a hypothesis on the evolution of housing law into infrastructure law, suggesting new principles for the state.
Relevance. The issues of further development of housing law have long been debatable for civil scholars: several directions of its development are proposed and discussed. The relevance of the issue lies in the fact that for the formation of the rules of law of the branch in the future, it is necessary to understand for what purposes and to solve what tasks of the state this branch should serve, so it is necessary to develop various hypotheses of the development of housing law and its principles, and accordingly test them: to prove or disprove. The author, in the work proposes actual now and in the future goals and objectives of the state and puts forward a hypothesis about the transformation of housing law into an infrastructural law, where these goals will be realized, proving and arguing his point of view. The purpose ‒ to form a hypothesis of future development of the housing law branch and its principles. Objectives: analyze the development of the housing law sector; analyze the hypothesis of transformation of housing law into infrastructure law; propose the concept of principles of infrastructure law. Methodology. In the process of working on the study, the methods of analysis and synthesis, dialectical method of arguing one's position, analytical method, comparative analysis were used. Results. The author formulated a hypothesis of transformation of housing law into infrastructure law. Defined the subject and object of infrastructural law. Formulated the basic principles of infrastructural law. Conclusion. As a result of the hypothesis proposed by the author about the transformation of housing law into infrastructure law, theoretical statements describing the main directions of the development of modern housing law in the future and its supposed principles are made. The arguments proving the hypothesis are offered.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Olga A. Kovaleva (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: