This analysis evaluates Indonesia's legal framework for combating phishing, highlighting limitations in enforcement and victim protection.
Key Points
The study finds that Indonesia's laws inadequately address phishing, leading to limited protection for victims and weak prosecution.
Data analysis revealed reliance on general provisions like the Penal Code and Electronic Information Law, which isn't sufficient for tackling phishing.
A normative juridical approach, alongside empirical insights, was employed to compare Indonesia's legal framework with international practices.
The findings emphasize the need for comprehensive legal reform to create specific offenses for phishing and improve law enforcement capabilities.