Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
September 10, 2025Open Access

Toward the Autonomous AI Doctor: Quantitative Benchmarking of an Autonomous Agentic AI Versus Board-Certified Clinicians in a Real World Setting

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

HHHashim HayatMKMaksim KudrautsauEMEvgeniy Makarov

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Retrospective comparison shows AI achieving 81% diagnostic concordance in urgent care, suggesting autonomy in healthcare applications.

Key Points

  • AI achieved an 81% match in diagnoses compared to human clinicians, demonstrating potential efficacy.
  • The AI's treatment plans aligned with human providers in 99.2% of cases, indicating high reliability.
  • In cases where diagnoses differed, AI outperformed humans 36.1% of the time, suggesting significant capabilities.
  • Findings highlight the potential of AI solutions to address workforce shortages in healthcare settings.

Cite This Study

Hayat et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c2427db210217d647a3b5ehttps://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.14.25331406
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Toward the Autonomous AI Doctor: Quantitative Benchmarking of an Autonomous Agentic AI Versus Board-Certified Clinicians in a Real World Setting2025 · 1 citations
  2. 2AI vs Human Performance in Conversational Hospital-Based Neurological Diagnosis2025 · 4 citations
  3. 3AI Agents in Clinical Medicine: A Systematic Review2025 · 36 citations
  4. 4Doctor-R1: Mastering Clinical Inquiry with Experiential Agentic Reinforcement Learning2025
  5. 5Evaluating Diagnostic Performance of Laypersons, Physicians, and AI-Augmented Physicians Across Clinical Complexity Levels2025