Analysis reveals issues in legal regulation of neurotechnologies, suggesting the need for frameworks at national and international levels.
Key Points
Fragmentary legislation in Russia regarding neurotechnology fails to encompass its broader implications and usage.
Countries like Chile, France, and the USA exhibit active development in specialized legal regulations concerning neurotechnologies.
International entities such as UNESCO and the UN focus on establishing principles to protect human rights in the context of emerging neuro-rights.
The specific impacts of neurotechnologies on individuals indicate an urgent need for tailored regulations to balance rights with technological advancements.