Experiments uncover bias in automatic speech recognition systems against various demographics, suggesting the need for proactive mitigation.
Automatic speech recognition (ASR) is increasingly used, e.g., in emergency response centers, domestic voice assistants, and search engines. Because of the paramount relevance spoken language plays in our lives, it is critical that ASR systems are able to deal with the variability in the way people speak (e.g., due to speaker differences, demographics, different speaking styles, and differently abled users). ASR systems promise to deliver an objective interpretation of human speech. Practice and recent evidence however suggest that the state-of-the-art ASRs struggle with the large variation in speech due to e.g., gender, age, speech impairment, race, and accents. The overarching goal of our research is to uncover bias in ASR systems to work toward proactive bias mitigation in ASR. In this talk, I will present systematic experiments aimed at quantifying, identifying the origin of, and mitigating the bias of state-of-the-art ASRs on speech from different, typically low-resource, groups of speakers, with a focus on bias against gender, age, regional accents, and non-native accents.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Odette Scharenborg (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: