Analysis of secondary naming issues in viticulture, suggesting a unified terminological system to enhance communication.
This work is devoted to the problem of secondary naming (synonymous and alternative terms) in viticulture. The study analyzes the fact that the same grape varieties, diseases or agrotechnical processes are called by different names in different regions, which leads to uncertainties in scientific and practical aspects. The main reasons for secondary naming are explained by oral traditions, historical terms, language and dialect differences, and the lack of a single standard in scientific naming. Also, the need to create a single terminological system based on international standards is justified as a solution to this problem. The work highlights the relevance of forming a single term base to reduce secondary naming, correctly identify grape varieties, and simplify scientific communication.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nuriddinova Nafisa Mukhiddin qizi (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: