Descriptive study reports 48.2% antibiotic prescribing in 506 patients, highlighting compliance issues with guidelines.
Introduction: Inappropriate antibiotic prescribing contributes to antibiotic resistance, a global public health concern, particularly in low-resource settings. This study aimed to evaluate antibiotics prescribing practices in the department of medicine and medical specialties at the University Hospital Center Yalgado Ouedraogo (CHU-YO). Methods: This was a descriptive cross-sectional study with retrospective data collection. It took place from January to March 2021. Antibiotic use was evaluated based on national and SPILF guidelines. Results: A total of five hundred and six patients were included. The prevalence of antibiotic prescription was 48.2%. Among patients taking antibiotics, 61.1% had received monotherapy. The most commonly prescribed antibiotics were beta-lactams (70.1%), particularly Amoxicillin + Clavulanic Acid (39.1%). The intravenous route was the most commonly used (79.6%). The average duration of administration was 5 days. Lower respiratory infections were the main indications for prescribing antibiotics. Antibiotic therapy was empiric in 96% of cases. It was in compliance with recommendations in 31.2% and justified in 78.1% of cases. Conclusion: Antibiotic prescribing at CHU-YO reveals significant gaps in compliance with established guidelines. Implementing local protocols and stewardship interventions is critical to optimizing antibiotic use and combating resistance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ouedraogo et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: