September 10, 2025Философская мысльOpen Access

The Becoming of Being: Process Ontology of Whitehead and Transductive Individuation of Simondon

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

The article demonstrates that both Whitehead and Simondon reject substantialist metaphysics in favor of dynamic processes.
It reveals that Whitehead's focus is on speculative cosmology while Simondon emphasizes mechanisms of individuation in various realms.
The methodological approach employs historical-philosophical reconstruction, conceptual analysis, and creative synthesis for thorough comparison.
The research highlights the interconnectedness of becoming across different domains, underscoring its relevance to modern philosophical inquiries.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Implication

Comparative analysis reveals dynamic processes of becoming in Whitehead's and Simondon's ontologies, suggesting their relevance for understanding contemporary realities.

Cite This Study

Vladislav Olegovich Sayapin (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c23fc3b210217d647973c1 https://doi.org/10.25136/2409-8728.2025.7.75276

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Implication

Comparative analysis reveals dynamic processes of becoming in Whitehead's and Simondon's ontologies, suggesting their relevance for understanding contemporary realities.

The Becoming of Being: Process Ontology of Whitehead and Transductive Individuation of Simondon

Key Points

Discussion

Implication

Cite This Study

The Becoming of Being: Process Ontology of Whitehead and Transductive Individuation of Simondon

Key Points

Discussion

Implication

Cite This Study