Methodological study validates the Speaking Up About Patient Safety Questionnaire in Turkish healthcare, demonstrating its reliability and validity.
Aim: This study aims to adapt the Speaking Up About Patient Safety Questionnaire into Turkish and conduct a validity and reliability study. Material and Methods: This study, which has a methodological design, was conducted from March to April 2022 with 333 healthcare professionals working in a university hospital in Ankara. Demographic Data Form and the Speaking Up About Patient Safety Questionnaire were used to collect data. Language, content, construct validity, and reliability coefficients were applied for data analysis. Results: The content validity rate and total content validity index for all sub-dimensions of the Turkish Speaking Up About Patient Safety Questionnaire were calculated as 1.00. The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin value was good enough for both subscales (0,834 and 0,881, respectively). Bartlett’s test of sphericity was significant. All factor loadings were above 0.3. The total variance explained was found to be 77. 856% for the Speak Up–Related Behavior Scale, and 76,009% for the Speak Up Related Climate Scale. Cronbach’s alpha (α) values for all sub-scales ranged from 0.77 to 0.92. Test-retest reliability results (r=0.987 and r=0.991) were statistically significant (p
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tezcan et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: