This review explores thermal insulation coatings' role in reducing carbon emissions in buildings, highlighting emerging technologies and challenges.
Global building energy consumption accounts for approximately 35% of total energy use, with its full-life-cycle carbon emissions emerging as a critical factor in achieving carbon peaking and neutrality goals. In China, for instance, operational building carbon emissions exceed 50% of the national total, while thermal losses through building envelopes in extreme climate zones like Xinjiang contribute over 50% of total energy consumption, underscoring the pivotal role of thermal insulation coatings in energy conservation. This review systematically examines conventional thermal insulation coating systems—including barrier-, reflective-, and radiative-type technologies—based on their porous structural optimization, high-refractive-index filler composites, and atmospheric window spectral regulation mechanisms. It further introduces emerging functional coatings: phase-change types utilizing microencapsulation to address leakage constraints, bioinspired coatings mimicking biological thermal management through hierarchical micro-nano structures, eco-friendly variants employing bio-based materials to reduce environmental impact, and transparent coatings balancing optical transparency with thermal insulation via nanocomposite engineering. However, current systems face persistent challenges including multi-scale interfacial instability, process cost-effectiveness limitations, and insufficient cross-climate service performance databases. Future research must prioritize breakthroughs in dynamic thermal-responsive smart materials, high-throughput directional assembly processes, and innovative full-life-cycle carbon accounting methodologies. These advancements will promote the evolution of building energy efficiency toward adaptive regulation and ecological sustainability, offering systematic solutions to support global carbon neutrality objectives.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: