Comparative analysis shows flood risk areas in Erbil using flood hazard assessment techniques, indicating effective methodologies for urban planning.
Flood intensity has significantly increased globally, which poses significant challenges for the environment and urban areas. This research aimed to evaluate the performance of different flood hazard assessment approaches to identify flood risk areas in Erbil city, Kurdistan region of Iraq. The analytical hierarchy process and the new ArcGIS pro flood simulation tool were compared to identify flood-risk areas and assess their performance based on historical flood events. Multiple factors such as rainfall, aspect, topographic wetness index, elevation, flow accumulation, lithology, soil data, normalized difference vegetation index, normalized difference built-up index, land use land cover, slope, stream power index, drainage density, evapotranspiration, infiltration rates, and distance to roads were considered to identify flood risk areas. Using the Analytical Hierarchy Process, areas spanning over 35 km² (3.9%) and 74 km² (27%) of Erbil city were identified as very high and high flood susceptible, respectively. However, the results of AFS indicated that an area of 66.3 km² (7.3%) of Erbil city will be inundated during rainfall intensity of 60 mm/day. The receiver operating characteristic area under the curve assessments showed the accuracy of AFS to be 95.3% and that of the Analytical Hierarchy Process to be 92.2%. The comparison analysis emphasized the effectiveness of ArcGIS Pro flood simulation in terms of accurate flood inundation assessments. This research provides significant insights into suitable approaches to flood hazard assessment by considering different scales and data availability, helping policymakers and urban planners understand floods better and implement appropriate mitigation strategies accordingly.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chomani et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: