Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
September 10, 2025American Journal of Translational Research

Comparison of prognosis between intravascular ultrasound-guided and angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndrome

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

SZShiming ZhaoHarbin Medical UniversityXZXiao Peng ZengBeijing Center for Disease Prevention and ControlCJChenghuan JiangNanjing Institute of Technology

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Retrospective cohort study compares cardiac function and quality of life in IVUS versus angiography-guided PCI in ACS patients.

Key Points

  • IVUS-guided PCI demonstrated superior outcomes, improving cardiac function and quality of life compared to angiography-guided methods.
  • The IVUS group showed a significant reduction in stent and neointima volumes at 9 months, indicating better procedural success.
  • Procedural complexity was higher for IVUS, with longer times and increased contrast use, though benefits outweighed drawbacks.
  • Quality of life improvements were observed, particularly in physical and social function scores, favoring IVUS guidance.

Cite This Study

Zhao et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c23e4fb210217d64791d1ehttps://doi.org/10.62347/gakw8223
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share