Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
September 10, 2025BMC SurgeryOpen Access

The efficacy of one-stage laparoscopic versus two-stage endo-laparoscopic management of cholecystocholedocholithiasis

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

MAMedhat M. AnwarSAShaimaa Abdelaziz AbdelmoneimMHM. Ben Hamida

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Analysis reveals one-stage laparoscopic management reduces costs and demonstrates comparable effectiveness in CCL cases, suggesting its viability over two-stage strategies.

Key Points

  • One-stage laparoscopic management resulted in significant cost savings of $2,046 per patient compared to two-stage management.
  • Procedural failure rates were lower for one-stage management at 4%, compared to 8% for two-stage management in patients with cholecystocholedocholithiasis.
  • One-stage laparoscopic approach had a longer median duration of 155 minutes compared to 95 minutes for the two-stage approach.
  • Hospital stay was similar for both management approaches, with a median of 3 days, indicating efficiency for both methods.

Cite This Study

Anwar et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c23e02b210217d64791082https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-025-03094-2
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share