September 10, 2025Naukovij vìsnik Nacìonalʹnoï akademìï vnutrìšnìh spravOpen Access

The legitimacy of restricting the right to liberty and security: Standards of the European Court of Human Rights

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

ОХОксана ХаблоAcademy of the Police Force in Bratislava YBYurii ButKyiv University of Law

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

This study examines standards governing law enforcement practices and custodial preventive measures, indicating their importance for fair legal proceedings.

Key Points

Legal standards for restricting liberty require a reasonable suspicion as determined by an investigating judge, ensuring fair procedures.
The European Court of Human Rights promotes substantive interpretations over formal charges, easing the application of custodial preventive measures.
Analysis of the grounds for preventive measures highlights the necessity for sufficient factual information to establish reasonable suspicion.
Uniform application of the ECHR's standards may enhance legal consistency and support the rule of law in Ukraine.

Cite This Study

Хабло et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c23e02b210217d64790bb1 https://doi.org/10.63341/naia-herald/2.2025.94

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Implication

This study examines standards governing law enforcement practices and custodial preventive measures, indicating their importance for fair legal proceedings.

The legitimacy of restricting the right to liberty and security: Standards of the European Court of Human Rights

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

The legitimacy of restricting the right to liberty and security: Standards of the European Court of Human Rights

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider