Descriptive qualitative analysis reveals differences in creative thinking skills among rational and guardian personality students.
Key Points
Students with rational personality types showed higher creative thinking ability at an average of CTA level 3, demonstrating fluency and flexibility in problem-solving.
The findings indicated that guardian personality types typically performed at CTA level 1, relying on a single method for problem-solving in mathematics.
Data triangulation ensured validity, while qualitative analysis focused on data reduction, display, and conclusions drawn from test performances and interviews.
Limitations include the focus on rational and guardian types; future studies are suggested to expand to artisan and idealist types for broader insights.