The introduction of generative AI in education transforms assessment and pedagogical practices, implying a need for ethical scrutiny.
The irruption of artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education – especially its generative forms, i.e., models capable of producing text, images, or code – has rapidly transformed pedagogical, administrative, and assessment practices in our institutions. We are facing a reconfiguration of the university space that cannot be reduced to the adoption of tools; instead, it demands a critical examination of its epistemic, ethical, and pedagogical implications. Generative AI has established a set of practices that, if not continuously monitored, could compromise the very essence of education in engineering and other disciplines [1].
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Herrera-Quintero et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: