Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
September 10, 2025

Antibacterial Efficiency of three Different Irrigation Methods in Infected Roots Infected with

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

MJMaryam Zare JahromiABAli BaghersadASAmir Mansour Shirani

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Experimental study compares antibacterial efficiency of laser diode, passive ultrasonic, and XP endofinisher in infected roots, highlighting significant outcomes.

Key Points

  • All three irrigation methods effectively reduced bacterial colonies compared to the control group.
  • Laser Diode 810 nm exhibited a significantly greater antibacterial effect than both the Ultra X and XP Endofinisher file methods.
  • Additional testing methods like the Kruskal-Wallis test demonstrated significant efficacy across the different irrigation techniques.
  • Results underscore the importance of effective irrigation methods in combatting Enterococcus faecalis in endodontic treatments.

Cite This Study

Jahromi et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c23b8fb210217d6478503ehttps://doi.org/10.30476/dentjods.2025.102497.2365
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Exploring the Impact of Various Irrigation Protocols on Endodontic Biofilms Cultivated on Prototyped Root Canals2025
  2. 2Comparative evaluation of root canal irrigants against enterococcus faecalis2025
  3. 3The Effectiveness of Different Intracanal Medicaments in Treating Apical Periodontitis2025
  4. 4A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE CLEANING EFFICIENCY OF CONVENTIONAL AND ULTRASONICALLY ACTIVATED ENDODONTIC IRRIGANTS2025
  5. 5Antimicrobial efficacy of herbal products in secondary endodontic infections: in vivo study2025