The positivity trap: is a bias against null results in research literature holding back science?

In this presentation, we will discuss the findings of one of the largest global surveys of the perceptions, experiences and behaviours regarding the sharing of null results, which was recently carried out by Springer Nature. 1 Null results (also known as negative results or inconclusive findings) are an important part of scientific literature, preventing the duplication of unnecessary research and increasing transparency and reproducibility in research. Nevertheless, there can be a perception of obstacles to publishing null results, through bias towards sharing or publishing research that does not present a positive outcome or lack of clarity around where and how they can be published. These factors and others may play a part in the reported decline of null results being published.2 This presentation will cover the benefits to research from wider sharing of null results and the current state of null result publishing before presenting the survey’s findings including perceptions of null results across disciplines and their impact on research and career progression. We will also look at what steps can be taken to increase this overlooked area of research dissemination by various involved stakeholders, including researchers, funders and publishers.