Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
September 5, 2025Frontiers in Oral HealthOpen Access

Accuracy of digital photographs for assessing inflammatory gum disease in epidemiologic studies

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

PTPaul TerryOWO. Lee WilsonMHMatthew L. Heaton

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Evaluation measures accuracy of digital photographs for detecting inflammatory gum disease, implying potential benefits for epidemiologic studies.

Key Points

  • The accuracy for identifying inflammatory gum disease from photographs ranged from 76.7% to 96.7%, indicating good diagnostic precision.
  • Sensitivity measurements showed variability from 70% to 95% across raters, highlighting differences in assessment capabilities.
  • Inter-rater reliability for disease severity was moderate, with Fleiss's Kappa values indicating fair agreement among raters.
  • These findings suggest that digital photographs may serve as effective tools for assessing inflammatory gum disease in epidemiologic contexts.

Cite This Study

Terry et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c23a2cb210217d6477f4fahttps://doi.org/10.3389/froh.2025.1667604
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Evaluation of an Intraoral Camera with an AI-Based Application for the Detection of Gingivitis2025
  2. 2Evaluating diagnostic accuracy and consistency in applying the 2017 periodontal classification among dental professionals2025
  3. 3The Influence of Examiner Experience on Inter- and Intra-Rater Agreement in Dental Restorations Identification on Three-Dimensional Digital Models2025
  4. 4Diagnostic Accuracy of Self-Reported Questionnaires for Detecting Periodontitis Across Multiple Cultures and Geographic Locations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.2025
  5. 5Comparative Analysis of 3D Imaging in Periodontal Disease Assessment: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis2025