This article examines the ontological conflict between embodied knowledge and detached reasoning, suggesting humanized methods may challenge neoliberal academic structures.
Key Points
Humanized research methods reveal the significance of emotional and embodied knowledge in academia.
The study utilizes collaborative autoethnography to explore tensions in fieldwork and knowledge production.
Reflexive workshops highlight how discomfort can unmask limiting narratives and foster transformation.
Meditative practices serve as emotional methodologies to bridge researcher and human subjectivities.