Oversight of the Constitutionality of Laws in the Jordanian Political System: A ‎Comparative Study

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

Discussion

Comparative analysis identifies constitutionality oversight in the Jordanian political system, suggesting implications for legal frameworks.

The findings indicate instances of unconstitutionality within legal legislation due to oversight shortcomings.
Analysis of constitutional amendments, particularly the 2011 changes, reveals immediate impact on legal rulings without retroactive effects.
Comparative evaluation with the US, France, and Egypt highlights significant differences in oversight practices in political systems.
Conclusions underscore that rulings by the Constitutional Court in Jordan are absolute, creating a unique legal context.

Al-Btoosh et al. (2025) studied this question.

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Comparative analysis identifies constitutionality oversight in the Jordanian political system, suggesting implications for legal frameworks.