Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
September 5, 2025Arena HukumOpen Access

Restorative Justice for Corruptors: A Solution or a Legal Setback?

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

IAIrfan ArdiansyahRRRustam Rustam

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Normative comparative analysis explores restorative justice's impact on law enforcement in corruption cases, suggesting regulatory frameworks.

Key Points

  • Applying restorative justice in corruption may expedite asset recovery, but without regulations, it risks enabling impunity.
  • The study highlights the need for a framework to balance effective law enforcement with the need for resolution in corruption cases.
  • Comparative legal analysis of restorative practices in Indonesia, Brazil, Colombia, and South Africa informs potential benefits and risks.
  • Stringent parameters for implementation are proposed to prevent erosion of legal deterrents and ensure accountability.

Cite This Study

Ardiansyah et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c23966b210217d6477c4d4https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum2025.01802.6
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Restorative Justice for Corruptors in Indonesia; Why and How?2024
  2. 2Rethinking Subsidiary in Corruption Cases: Indonesian Experiences2025 · 4 citations
  3. 3Optimizing the Recovery of Corrupt Assets from the Perspective of Economic Rights and Human Security in Indonesia2025
  4. 4The Implementation of Restorative Justice in Cases Involving Corporate Perpetrators2025
  5. 5CONFISCATING CORRUPTION ASSETS WITHOUT VERDICT: MASHLAHAH-BASED STRATEGY TO RESTORE STATE FINANCES2025