Integrated DS InSAR and CNN-LSTM model enhances deformation monitoring in coal basins, indicating geological impact.
Mining subsidence is a pervasive geohazard in coal basins, and precise and reliable deformation monitoring is essential to effective risk mitigation. Conventional time-series Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) suffers from vegetation-induced decorrelation and atmospheric delays. Most predictive models leverage only temporal information. We introduced an integrated DS InSAR + CNN LSTM framework for subsidence monitoring and forecasting. Forty-three Sentinel-1A scenes (2017–2018), corrected with Generic Atmospheric Correction Online Service for InSAR (GACOS) data, were processed to derive cumulative deformation, cross-validated against multi-view SBAS InSAR, and used to train a CNN LSTM network that predicts trends one year in advance. The findings indicate that (1) DS InSAR provides 2.83 times the monitoring density of SBAS InSAR, with deformation rate R2 = 0.83, RMSE = 0.0028 m/a, and MAE = 0.0019 m/a at common pixels. The RMS average decrease in GACOS atmospheric delay phase correction is 2.52 mm. (2) High- and low-settlement zones comprise 0.11% and 92.32% of the area, respectively; maximum velocity reaches 190.61 mm/a, with a cumulative subsidence of −338.33 mm. (3) Across the five zones with the most severe subsidence, the CNN–LSTM model attains R2 values of 0.97–0.99 and RMSE below 1 mm, markedly outperforming the standalone LSTM network. (4) Deformation correlated strongly with geological structures, groundwater decline (R2 = 0.66–0.78), and precipitation (slope > 0.33), highlighting coupled natural and anthropogenic control.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: