December 31, 2023ShodhKosh Journal of Visual and Performing Arts

Legal Accountability of Autonomous AI Systems in Criminal Justice

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

The emergence of autonomous AI systems complicates traditional notions of legal accountability risks, indicating a significant shift in how the law addresses AI actions.
As AI systems often operate as black boxes, tracing responsibility for harmful actions becomes increasingly difficult, potentially diffusing liability among multiple actors.
Traditional legal concepts, particularly regarding actus reus, struggle to encompass the non-human agency of AI, suggesting a need for revised accountability measures in law.
Corporate criminal responsibility for AI manufacturers may offer a viable path for holding parties accountable, emphasizing the importance of adapting legal frameworks to modern challenges.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Implication

This analysis shows how autonomous AI systems challenge legal accountability in criminal justice, highlighting the need for updated liability frameworks.

Cite This Study

Gurprem Monga (2023) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c23837b210217d647768ec https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v4.i2.2023.6172

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Implication

This analysis shows how autonomous AI systems challenge legal accountability in criminal justice, highlighting the need for updated liability frameworks.

Legal Accountability of Autonomous AI Systems in Criminal Justice

Key Points

Discussion

Implication

Cite This Study

Legal Accountability of Autonomous AI Systems in Criminal Justice

Key Points

Discussion

Implication

Cite This Study