August 17, 2025

Evaluating Emergency Preparedness And Health System Resilience: A Cross-Country Analysis Of COVID-19 Responses In OECD And LMIC Contexts

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

MSMuh Ibnu SholehState University of Semarang HAHayat Ali

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Mixed-methods analysis compares health system resilience and governance in OECD and LMIC nations during COVID-19, highlighting key factors influencing outcomes.

Key Points

Health system resilience varied significantly across countries during the COVID-19 pandemic.
OECD countries generally had higher capacities, yet policy timing and public trust heavily influenced outcomes.
A mixed-methods comparative approach used data from WHO, OECD, and World Bank, along with case studies.
Governance quality and community engagement were found to be more critical for resilience than economic status alone.

Cite This Study

Sholeh et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c2366fb210217d6477448f https://doi.org/10.71305/ijhsp.v1i1.338

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Implication

Mixed-methods analysis compares health system resilience and governance in OECD and LMIC nations during COVID-19, highlighting key factors influencing outcomes.

Evaluating Emergency Preparedness And Health System Resilience: A Cross-Country Analysis Of COVID-19 Responses In OECD And LMIC Contexts

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

Evaluating Emergency Preparedness And Health System Resilience: A Cross-Country Analysis Of COVID-19 Responses In OECD And LMIC Contexts

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider