This essay discusses hypotheses in qualitative research, highlighting their potential role in preregistration and reporting formats.
<ns3:p>Hypotheses are not common in qualitative research. This can be largely attributed to many qualitative methods not being optimal or suitable for hypothesis-testing, and the epistemological curiosity in qualitative research often lacking interest in testing. Nonetheless, qualitative researchers, too, do often enter research projects with expectations, which are similar to hypotheses. These expectations can be useful to disclose and reflect on before a study is carried out. In this essay, I discuss qualitative hypotheses (QHs) as a means to disclose such expectations without testing them. In particular, QHs are presented as a tool that can be useful with recently proliferated reporting formats, such as a preregistration and registered reports, which involve a pre-analytic phase of written reflection.</ns3:p>
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Veli‐Matti Karhulahti (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: