Experimental investigation reveals varying fracture toughness in rubberized concrete specimens, suggesting new optimization methods.
With the advancement of modern engineering structures, traditional cement concrete is increasingly unable to meet the mechanical performance requirements under complex conditions. To overcome the performance limitations of materials, modified concrete has become a focal point of research. By incorporating modifying materials such as fibers, polymers, or mineral admixtures, the properties of concrete can be significantly enhanced. Among these, rubberized concrete has attracted considerable attention due to its unique performance advantages. This study conducted fracture tests on rubberized concrete using non-standard concrete three-point bending beam specimens of varying dimensions to evaluate its fracture performance. Employing conventional concrete fracture theoretical models, the fracture toughness parameters of rubberized concrete were calculated, and a comparative analysis was performed regarding the applicability of various theoretical calculation formulas to rubberized concrete. The results indicated that the fracture performance of rubberized concrete varied significantly with changes in specimen size. The initial toughness exhibited a consistent size-dependent variation across different theoretical models. The fracture toughness corresponding to crack height ratios between 0.05 and 0.25 showed contradictory trends; however, for crack height ratios between 0.3 and 0.5, the fracture toughness became consistent. This study integrated boundary effect theory and employed Guinea’s theory to propose an optimization coefficient γ for the double-K fracture toughness formula, yielding favorable optimization results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gao et al. (2025) studied this question.