August 8, 2025Journal for social science archives

Case Study of Chilas and Swat Floods: Assessing State Responsibility under the Lens of Climate Justice

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Floods in Chilas and Swat highlight significant state responsibility gaps regarding climate-induced disasters and aid.
Research identified failures in early warning systems and infrastructure, contributing to devastating impacts on affected communities.
Qualitative case study methodology utilized field interviews and legal analysis to assess climate justice principles.
Bridging the gap between policy commitments and actual relief actions requires systemic reform and active community involvement.

Authors

RARehana AnjumUniversity of Sindh ESErum ShaikhUnited States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit ABArun BarkatUniversity of Sindh

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Implication

Qualitative case study examines floods in Chilas and Swat, showing inadequate infrastructure and delayed warnings suggest state responsibility issues under climate justice.

Cite This Study

Anjum et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68af7c827567bf4f94ff35c6 https://doi.org/10.59075/jssa.v3i3.312

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Implication

Qualitative case study examines floods in Chilas and Swat, showing inadequate infrastructure and delayed warnings suggest state responsibility issues under climate justice.

Case Study of Chilas and Swat Floods: Assessing State Responsibility under the Lens of Climate Justice

Key Points

Discussion

Implication

Cite This Study

Case Study of Chilas and Swat Floods: Assessing State Responsibility under the Lens of Climate Justice

Key Points

Discussion

Implication

Cite This Study