The ideological assessment explores the holistic framework of human existence, highlighting the significance of social context.
A person is unique in that they represent the unity of the laws of nature and society. In this sense, human life is a unified and interconnected process. Throughout their life, a person learns about the world and expresses themselves as a single, indivisible entity. Therefore, understanding a person in both social and natural contexts should be grounded in this sense of wholeness. It should be noted that this reality is asymmetric, since the social essence of a person acts as a leading one when considering the characteristics of existence. At the same time, the concept of dual qualitative certainty and inconsistency acts in understanding the unity of the natural and social in a person. Such duality is asymmetric, since the social essence of a person is the leading one in revealing the characteristics of existence. In this article, an attempt is made to show the methodological significance of this fact.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
EFENDIYEV et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: