Analysis reveals misunderstandings in identifying defective and illegal evidence, suggesting improvements in judicial processes.
In the trial of cases, evidence has always been a crucial part of the trial process. Clarifying the application rules of evidence is not only conducive to fully pro-tecting the legitimate rights and interests of the parties involved but also can effectively promote fair adjudication. However, from the current judicial situa-tion, there are numerous misunderstandings in the identification of defec-tive evidence and illegal evidence. The existence of these misunderstandings will not only affect the handling of evidence but also interfere with the trial of cases, so this issue must be taken seriously. Therefore, this article takes the misunder-standings in the identification of defective evidence and illegal evi-dence as the research object. On the basis of clarifying relevant concepts, it an-alyzes the misunderstandings existing in judicial practice and puts forward tar-geted solu-tions, hoping to further promote the handling of evidence-related issues.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
T. Zhang (2025) studied this question.