Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
August 22, 2025PLoS ONEOpen Access

Effectiveness and challenges of digital tools implementation for enhancing infectious disease surveillance data quality in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review protocol

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

OOOluwatosin Olu-AbiodunAFAderinsola FaturotiBabcock UniversityAAAkinmade Adepoju

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Systematic review assesses digital tools' impact on data quality in LMICs, suggesting policy recommendations.

Key Points

  • Digital tools improve infectious disease reporting speed and accuracy in low- and middle-income countries, overcoming infrastructural challenges.
  • Evidence shows that mobile health apps and electronic reporting systems enhance data quality in surveillance efforts.
  • This systematic review protocol analyzes outcomes like reporting delays and error rates, comparing digital and traditional methods.
  • Results may guide effective implementation of digital solutions in disease monitoring, bolstering global health security.

Cite This Study

Olu-Abiodun et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68af73567567bf4f94fecb7ahttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0330904
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Guidelines for reporting of health interventions using mobile phones: mobile health (mHealth) evidence reporting and assessment (mERA) checklist2016 · 681 citations
  2. 2Optimising the value of the critical appraisal skills programme (CASP) tool for quality appraisal in qualitative evidence synthesis2020 · 1,118 citations